Bonjour.
Install Theme

A Different Idea of Privacy →

Woolf often conceives of life this way: as a gift that you’ve been given, which you must hold onto and treasure but never open. Opening it would dispel the atmosphere, ruin the radiance—and the radiance of life is what makes it worth living. It’s hard to say just what holding onto life without looking at it might mean; that’s one of the puzzles of her books. But it has something to do with preserving life’s mystery; with leaving certain things undescribed, unspecified, and unknown; with savoring certain emotions, such as curiosity, surprise, desire, and anticipation. It depends on an intensified sense of life’s preciousness and fragility, and on a Heisenberg-like notion that, when it comes to our most abstract and spiritual intuitions, looking too closely changes what we feel. It has to do, in other words, with a kind of inner privacy, by means of which you shield yourself not just from others’ prying eyes, but from your own.

photojojo:

Today marks the anniversary of the historic protests in Tienanmen Square, along with the subsequent crackdown by the Chinese government. 

Journalist Terril Yue Jones was at the scene in 1989 and recently shared a set of never-before-seen photos she took at the protest.

Unseen Photos from the Tienanmen Square Protests of ‘89

via Reddit

The US Justice Department is charging figures linked to the Chinese military with stealing US trade secrets, in an escalation of tensions with China over economic espionage.

Suspicions about extensive corporate data theft have swirled around China for years, but never before has the US formally accused the People’s Liberation Army with criminal activity.

Last year, a report by the information security firm Mandiant concluded that a unit of the PLA, known as Unit 61398, was likely behind data theft comprising hundreds of terabytes. It found that the scale of the espionage was unlikely to have occurred without government sponsorship.

But it is unlikely that the US accusation will result in placing Chinese officials in custody, and some diplomatic risk is likely. James Lewis, a cybersecurity expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the effect would be “intangible” but the formal accusation “sends a strong message” to Beijing.

The cybercrime accusations come as the disclosures surrounding the National Security Agency indicate that at least some US surveillance redounds to America’s economic benefit.

The Guardian, "U.S. to Bring Criminal Charges Against Chinese Officials in Espionage Probe."

This should do as much as the sanctions against Russia have done in re: the Ukraine.

(via inothernews)

The Most Hilarious Yahoo! Answers Questions & Answers →

scottov:

jesusiswhatthisworldneeds:

sarahsparklez:

I present you the very first weirdos Yahoo! had to with before Tumblr.

Gallery

IM IN LOVE WITH MY DOG!? EVERYTIME HE PLAYS WITH OTHER DOGS I GET REALLY JEALOUS!? ROFLLLLL

These are hilarious lol

They’re forgetting that weirdo that fed blood of her tampon to her boyfriend because she wanted to turn him into a vampire. 

the fact that there are famous yahoo answers…

(via thefuuuucomics)

(Source: awkwardrabbit, via hellotailor)

rosalarian:

Feminism is having a wardrobe malfunction.

Does your brand of feminism remove barriers for women, or simply move them around? Does is expand options for women, or does it just shift them? You don’t liberate women by forcing them to choose option B instead of option A. What is comfortable for you might not be comfortable for someone else, and it’s entirely possible that what you see as oppressive, other women find comfortable or even downright liberating.

Before you think the girl in the middle is a strawman, let me tell you I used to be her, back in my misguided youth. I considered myself the standard to which other people should adhere. But that was stupid. It’s not up to me to tell people how to dress, and it’s much nicer to let everyone choose for themselves.

Some women would feel naked without a veil. Some women would find it restrictive. Some women would feel restricted by a bra. Some women would feel naked without one. Some women would feel restricted by a tight corset. Others love them. Some wear lots of clothes with a corset. Some only wear the corset and nothing else. What makes any article of clothing oppressive is someone forcing you to wear it. And it’s just as oppressive to force someone not to wear something that they want to wear.

That first photo.

These two are in the most beautiful bromance I’ve ever seen. Don’t care if it’s for a movie. Such a beautiful bromance.

(Source: bollywoodeditorial)